Demonstrating the challenge posed by plaintiffs who choose to represent themselves in legal proceedings, a federal court in Hawaii recently denied a plaintiff’s proposed first amended complaint — asserting, among many other claims, that her lender violated RESPA Section 2605 — after finding the plaintiff’s 69-page, pro-semotion “argumentative, prolix, replete with redundancy and largely irrelevant.”
TO READ THE FULL STORY
Cover Story: